Skip navigation.

Mortgage Mess. Should There Be A National Investigation?

Chris White's picture

Opinions, opinions. We’re all equal. We’ve all got opinions. Because we’re all equal all our opinions are worth exactly the same. And because we’re free no one is going to take them away from us. Hell No!

So, on important issues like the financial crisis and where it has come from and is going, there are probably as many opinions as there are those of us expressing views. “It happened already,” “It hasn’t happened yet,” “It isn’t going to happen,” “It’s unstoppable,” “Only a revolution will work,” “Just let the banks take care of it,” “Get the politicians involved,” “Keep the politicians out of it.”

Surely opinion is a whole lot better than fantasy or imagination, but opinion is more fickle than belief, and for sure it is not knowledge, for it cannot account for the causes and principles of its own existence.

One way of organizing a consensus among people with different opinions about important things is to have an investigation to determine what the truth is, reconcile different accounts, and come up with an account, or accounts, and proposals on what should be done. The South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission chaired by Archbishop Desmond Tutu was a good example of that kind of process. Tutu presents Commission report.

There have been other efforts, in other countries where horrible things happened. The South African one seems to provide one of the richest veins of experience that can be mined by those looking for resources to help put things right. Other commissions.

The South African commission’s organizers were much more effective than the secretive 9/11 commission was in the U.S. because they were working to get things into the public domain and to get the public involved with what they were doing at every level. They created circumstances in which it became clear what non-collaborators were protecting. They worked in sunlight not in the shadows.

I’m just mentioning this because there does seem to be a kind of ground swell emerging that there should be some kind of accounting for the mortgage mess. This came out today from Conde Nast’s Portfolio and it provides a summary of what has been going on, and what the precedents are in the history of US financial debacles, and there have been a few. Investigate Mortgage Mess.

It would be a worth while effort to study how the South African commission was organized and how it carried out its mandate, because it would be a good way to tying together all the threads that are unraveling with the financial mess.

“How come the world’s most powerful nation, which supposedly has the most productive farmers, can no longer feed itself?”
“How come the country can no longer produce its own clothing or shoes?” “Why do toys for children have to come from China?”
“What do our people have to do to be treated as citizens again, and not drones or worker and soldier ants?” "Why are we subsidizing the pharmaceutical industry to produce overseas?"

“How is the impoverishment of the country related to financial fraud and rip-off?” “Why is the dollar being wrecked to destroy people’s living standards and save the banks?” “Who is responsible?”

We’ve probably all got different views on that, but might perhaps be able to get together to figure out what’s true and what isn’t, on a strictly non-partisan, non-sexist, non-racist basis of course. It might even be quite educational in a certain kind of way. What do you think?

StumbleThis
tags:

Set Up Buzz!

More emphasis

on investigations and forcible reductions in debt here (this morning's daily news).

Remedies? In addition to forcible debt reduction, place the subprime lending industry in stasis: suspend trading on their stock for up to six months while the investigations continue. Kinda like a "people's protective order".

Chris White's picture

OPM-- Other Peoples' Money

The banks need to be stopped from using other peoples' money in something like the way SeriousBull suggests.

As you know this is a political, not an administrative or enforcement question. The problem is one of developing the political will to make administrative and enforcement solutions possible.

A prompt agreement with US creditors, on stabilizing the dollar, going back to long term state to state oil deals, pulling troops out of the middle east, and beginning to define an alternate energy future is necessary, in my opinion, to stop more serious economic dislocation inside the US, given what the country can no longer do for itself.But who is going to do it?

With oil at $100 plus average for the year more money than is in the stimulus package will be transferred to the oil producers. I thought the Chinese would get the money via Wal-mart. But it looks like they'll be disappointed again.

I think if the dollar gets within reach of 1.60 to the Euro before the upcoming Fed meeting there might be a big international crisis quite soon afterward. But I just look at charts and don't know what I'm talking about anymore than anyone else does.

Politics

Each point you raise leads back to the fact that we have virtually no leadership at any level of government right now. Confidence is low.

Is Scot J. Paltrow kidding?

Why is no one calling for an independent inquiry into what caused the mortgage-market collapse?

Neither the White House nor Congress has made any move to establish such a commission. Instead, the consensus so far is to leave investigations and solutions to the regulatory agencies, lawmakers, and other political figures—among those who'd stood by even when the potential for disaster had become clear.

The US system of Federal government has become so co-opted to corporate interests, those who are seated at regulatory/oversight table would be looking into affairs of the powers who'd originally hired them to lobby whatever politician it was who appointed them to regulate the former employer hiring them as a lobbyist in the first place.

I just don't get how Americans don't get it, it's not that complex.

On the other hand, because they are all industry insiders, a forward-looking, not seeking to blame or incriminate, bipartisan commission (aren't they all?!) might just get some answers to And, more importantly, how to prevent a repeat?

Chris White's picture

Yes it is a good point

That's why I thought the South African type approach do you see by-passing what might be expected from the ownership.

Chris, I'm sure you recognized my rhetorical fusillade

was aimed in the direction, probably more of Paltrow's readers, than even himself. I understand you've got a good picture of the issues.

...and by the way, thanks for continuing to present the arguments here. I've been so unidirectional for awhile, now, that it's a tough thing to catch and keep up with meta-phenomena such as have rolled through the world economy lately.

You and Tony Wilkrent have been good prompts to that part of my brain.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.