History in the Making: Phony Myths, Reality Creation And The Stuff of Legend

GreyHawk's picture
For the first time in American history, one of the nominees for President is a non-white male. Another significant first-time achievement for this election cycle is the fact that a woman was one of the most likely alternatives for a viable candidate. And finally, for the first time in recent history, the politics of fear and smear that have become the modus operandi of the Republican noise machine have finally begun to wear thin on the American public, reducing the banality of the shrieking messengers and their flaming notes of fecal detritus to a low-intensity, somewhat irritating buzz almost lost in the background noise of general day to day life. During the rise toward their ultimate heights of hubris, corruption and power, the Republican leadership -- closely aligned with the neoconservative mindset that had infiltrated the Executive Branch and infected a myriad of governmental agencies with politicized agendas -- began to believe that they had, in fact, finally achieved the long sought-after "permanent Republican Majority" that Karl Rove had promised.1 They hadn't -- they had come close, but fate and fortune showed mercy on a nation beset by their arrogance and greed, and their house of cards began to tumble. That never stopped them from believing, even to this day, that their power and influence extends far enough that they can reshape reality into whatever form they wish it to take. Some of them are beginning to wake from that dangerous delusion, just as most of the nation has begun to cast off the pall from nearly eight years of unchallenged Republican rule. The delusion still continues in some, unable to comprehend such a potent fall from grace. Karl Rove, the infamous "Architect" of Bush's second-term "victory," has begun to try and cast aspersions against the new Democratic candidate. Others, like Charlie Black -- a political advisor for the John McCain campaign -- are attempting other tactics; desperation appears to be heavy, saturating the air and making them all crazy. In an Op-Ed published in the New York times on 25 June, Maureen Dowd takes a quick look at and instantly dismisses the Karl Rove effect. The piece is called More Phony Myths and is worth a look. Dowd not only slaps down the attempts by Rove to paint Obama as "elitist" but also addresses the recent statement by Mr. Black that was wholly unnecessary, highly inappropriate and scary in that it reflects the thinking of other panicking Republicans:

_____

Charlie Black crassly argued in Fortune that a terrorist attack would “be a big advantage” for John McCain. And what’s scary is, Black is the smartest adviser McCain’s got.

_____

Dowd sums up her take on Black's skewed worldview with the following words:

_____

It’s hard to believe that if Americans get attacked after all these years of getting strip-searched at the airport, they’re going to be filled with confidence at the performance of the Republicans on national security. And at least Obama wants to catch Osama and doesn’t think he’s getting his directions on war from "a higher Father."2

_____

Indeed. In fact, I'd go a step a further, and surmise that the vast majority of Americans would be righteously ticked off. I'd even said as much in response to my first encounter of news about Black's idiotic message:

_____

They don't get it, do they?

"Another terror attack" would piss the hell out of the vast majority of Americans, who have put up with 7+ years of unmitigated gall and bullsh!t only to find that it has been sheer luck that the incompetent, subversive, treasonous bastards at the helm have avoided another attack at all, and the sheer incompetence at stopping another one before the chimp was even out of office would pull away all the stops.

They'd be yanked from office, tried for their crimes and sent to the Hague in a one-way overnight express envelope.

_____

We've seen what eight years of unopposed Republican control of all three branches of government does: it decimates our nation, weakens our military, undermines our Constitution, foments widespread corruption throughout government and the Department of Justice, destroys our economic viability and elevates the extremely rich -- and corporations -- well above the rights and freedoms of ordinary Americans. The Republican leadership ~should~ be scared. Any true US Patriot -- regardless of party affiliation -- should be rejecting the entire political backbone of today's Republican leaders, going back to the Newt Gingrich era and permanently painting all those "influential" leaders as tainted goods. They, and their steadfast manipulation of language in attempts to reshape reality to their vision, have resulted in the horror-filled landscape that now confronts us. Ordinary citizens who are not "rich" -- be they Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, Greens, Independents or any other stripe -- should wholeheartedly reject the core, hypocritical philosophy that supports those currently (and recently) empowered. Ordinary citizens -- true citizens, who believe in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights -- should take a moment to step back and see where the words and actions diverge, and where manipulation has led our nation down a primrose path that is overgrown with thorny weeds and runs through a minefield on the way toward a sea of effluent expelled from the bowels of the nation's seediest realms of political machination. This November, if our nation is to stand a chance to survive, everything and everyone currently empowered as Republican in our nation's capitol must be rejected. McCain must lose his bid to continue the Bush Presidency, and must ultimately be pushed to release all the information he's successfully blocked and diverted from investigative oversight into the malignancy of the Bush Presidency. Just as many nations of the world briefly announced that "We are all American" in the immediate aftermath of 9-11 (before the Bush Administration's mad rush to war in the Middle East squandered it all), it is now time for all US Citizens to come together as one and wholeheartedly reject the current incarnation of the Republican party that struggles to hold on to its pressure power and influence. We've drank enough poison at their infected well. Now it's time to purge and heal. Let this election make history, and the recovery of our nation become the stuff of legend. Namaste. ______________________ Footnotes ______________________
  1. More about Karl Rove and the GOP's "permanent" Republican Majority:

    _____

    _____

  2. From The Independent, by Rupert Cornwell in Washington, Friday, 7 October 2005.

    _____

    Bush: God told me to invade Iraq
    President 'revealed reasons for war in private meeting'

    President George Bush has claimed he was told by God to invade Iraq and attack Osama bin Laden's stronghold of Afghanistan as part of a divine mission to bring peace to the Middle East, security for Israel, and a state for the Palestinians.

    The President made the assertion during his first meeting with Palestinian leaders in June 2003, according to a BBC series which will be broadcast this month.

    [...click here for full article...]

    _____

Comments

MichaelCollins's picture

"drank" the poison and had it forced down our throat

Your points are all well taken. It's a shame the press can't get off their corporate script long enough to look around and see the obvious - 73% DISAPPROVE - 23% APPROVE. It's been headed that way (or it was already there) for a while. The ARG poll on the economy a month or so had Bush at 18% approval, a poll without an agenda. I'd meant to comment on the bill of particulars you put out. I think it represents a strong majority consensus. That's a reflection of the 73% disapproval. We didn't get there without the people doing their homework. How else would they get the information other than through hard work and sharing. Obama breaks a number of rules. One that will occur after his election is an opportunity one his part to recognize that great leaders follow rather than lead when the people are aroused. He just has to listen and follow through. -------------- "Furthest from him is best, whom reason hath equaled, force hath made supreme above his equals." Milton
"Furthest from him is best, whom reason hath equaled, force hath made supreme above his equals." Milton
GreyHawk's picture

Good point.

    "He just has to listen and follow through."
That is an essential two-prong key to leadership. Another aspect of it is to know ~what~ to listen to, and being able to discern real issues from the chaotic churning of outcries that are clamoring for attention.

and then there's the Franklin comment

about George Washington (highlighted in the the McCullough biography of John Adams).
He was the tallest man in the room, thus a natural born leader.
GreyHawk's picture

Ah, an interesting assessment.

And one that can be so tragically misplaced, but -- particularly in that instance -- didn't turn out so bad. ;)
GreyHawk's picture

A belated hat-tip to pmeldrum...

...who first pointed me toward the MoDowd piece. I'd gotten into a writing frenzy and completely forgot who pointed me there until I saw his original email message again.

Hat tip

Thanks Grey Seems sometimes I can get stuff that is useful. http://forums.delphiforums.com/RelPol/start
GreyHawk's picture

Heh -- you do well for a crazy Canuckian. ;)

Those darn Canadians...it's like they pay attention or something...

From the original

From the original source: "Abbas said that at Aqaba, Bush promised to speak with Sharon about the siege on Arafat. He said nobody can speak to or pressure Sharon except the Americans. According to Abbas, immediately thereafter Bush said: "God told me to strike at al Qaida and I struck them, and then he instructed me to strike at Saddam, which I did, and now I am determined to solve the problem in the Middle East. If you help me I will act, and if not, the elections will come and I will have to focus on them." http://tinyurl.com/f542

Note on Republican tactics and Dowd's column

First, on the body of this article: I hope that you are correct on the fall of Rovian tactics. However, I harbor great fear that the vote theft deus ex machina, and voter suppression can still lead to another stolen election. Now to add my own bit of snark to Ms Dowd's comments: "The Bushes had to move all the way to Texas from Greenwich to make their blue blood appear more red." That may indeed have been part of their strategy, but there is another factor: Texas has no state income tax. Back in the days of George I, his official residence was a hotel room in Houston. I think it was the Texas Observer which regularly published a little item entitled "Who's Living in George (H.W.) Bush's Home." Molly Ivins made fun of Bush Senior's pretensions of being a Texan saying, "Down here we call someone like that a tourist." (quotes are only approximate, from memory.)
GreyHawk's picture

I hear your caution re: the election theft options.

That's going to be one of their main thrusts -- particularly after the tremendous surge in newly registered voters. We all need to push for transparency and oversight there, and to face down any attempts to intimidate voters or disenfranchise them. Love the Ivins reference -- and it's too true, they'll pretend to be anything if it'll help put a less obnoxious shade of lipstick on their pig.

Kladner... you probably know ...

when did George I move out of his hotel... wasn't it only after Molly's bringing light of day to his "residency"?

Geoge I's Hotel

Honestly, I'm not sure. I'm not even sure that he cared that much what a small progressive Texas rag had to say about him. I'll take a look, though. Wish I could ask my dear departed Daddy. He'd know. Just checked. Texas Observer's archives only go back to 1999. I think this would have been early '90s.

I'll withhold

my thoughts and just offer up today's Daily Howler piece from Bob Somerby on Dowd. Bob has been monitoring the media for years, going back to 1998. He knows a wolf in sheep's clothing when he sees one.
GreyHawk's picture

Dowd's capacity for running hot and cold and for

coming off as flip-floppy and/or calculating aside, the points she makes re: Rove and Black are valid enough. Several of the points Somerby makes regarding her own descriptions aren't far off the mark, either.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.