Daily Kos diarist G2geek published an essay on January 10 that deserves attention and further analysis. He argued that rash media figures activate lone wolf types through "emotional rhetoric." When the lone wolves commit an assassination, bombing, etc., the emotional rhetoric of media personalities makes them stochastic terrorists. Why? The volume and intensity of their rhetoric will inevitably launch a lone wolf terrorist on the unsuspecting target for assassination. G2geek says that the theory does not yet apply to the Giffords assassination due to limited information on the assassin. However, the author provides examples of previous political murders used to support his argument and theory.
Medicare is Australia's publicly-funded universal health care system, operated by the government authority Medicare Australia.
The programme was introduced in 1975 as Medibank, and supplemented by a government-owned private health insurance fund in 1976.
35 years ago Australian politicians voted to introduce universal health care coverage for all its citizens.
It did not however, come without a fight. Even as far back as 1975, Rupert Murdoch, owner of News Limited, Fox News, was working to dictate the direction of our 'so called' democracy, via his media organization's influence on Australian public opinion.
In 1972, Murdoch acquired the Sydney morning tabloid The Daily Telegraph from Australian media mogul Sir Frank Packer, …
Murdoch threw his growing power behind the Australian Labor Party under the leadership of Gough Whitlam and duly saw it elected... in 1972 on a social platform that included universal free health care, free education for all Australians to tertiary level....
Rupert Murdoch's flirtation with Whitlam turned out to be brief.
As the Whitlam government began to lose public support following its re-election in 1974, Murdoch turned against Whitlam and supported the Governor-General's dismissal of the Prime Minister.
What you see above is an individual averse to social policy which puts young people, irrespective of background, on an equal footing with their peers.
[update - CM1] bumping because this deserves a second look even if it is a quick post.
The Chinese Government has described the view that climate change is not man-made as a marginal and "extreme" outlook.
According to Xie Zhenhua, a deputy director at China's powerful National Development and Reform Commission, climate change is a fact based on long-term observation in many countries.
At the annual session of China's National People's Congress, he said that those who advocate that climate change is not man-made are holding an extreme and marginal view.
He said that the majority of the world's scientists believed that climate change has been caused by burning fossil fuels.
He and other officials said that more work needed to be done to ensure that scientific data on climate change was watertight, but the world had no choice but to reduce its reliance on fossil fuels.
Mr Xie said climate change is not only something that ordinary Chinese people can feel and experience every day, but that it may soon have a huge impact on China's food security and even its economic stability.
They also stated that there is some differing of opinion on what is causing this, however that sensible policy is to recognize and begin to take steps to mitigate the risk.