Landmark Supreme Court Win for Liberty Points Way for Dem Victory in November
Update: CCR Produces Analysis of Landmark Supreme Court Decision
via mal contends
The Supreme Court decision (in Boumediene v. Bush /Al Odah v. United States) is a historic affirmation of the principle of habeas corpus (in Latin, "you shall have the body"), and a rejection of the acclaimed right of the tyrant, George W. Bush in this instance, to imprison another with no sound recourse for the accused; in these cases, the detained prisoners at the U.S. base at Guantánamo.
Habeas corpus refers simply to the right of the accused to go before an impartial judge and challenge the rationale behind the denial of his/her liberty.
"One of the oldest and most basic legal protections, habeas corpus affords the incarcerated the right to stand before a judge and confront the charges presented against him or her. The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) has been sending habeas counsel to represent the prisoners at the base since winning the first Guantánamo case, Rasul v. Bush, in 2004, and applauds today’s decision," reads CCR's press release.
That's a modest statement.
It's fitting that CCR, an organization that grew out the civil rights movement— specifically Arthur Kinoy and the Kunstler brothers (nigga-loving Jews as they were known back then, and let's never forget, in the 1960s by the southern states' white power structures) and 1,000s more heroes of liberty whose names history will not record—researched and argued this landmark victory for liberty.
It is also sobering, as a NYT editorial notes today, that "... habeas hangs by a single vote in the Supreme Court of the United States—a reminder that the composition of the court could depend on the outcome of this year’s presidential election. The ruling is a major victory for civil liberties—but a timely reminder of how fragile they are."
Sobering, yes, but also inspiring of optimism for the coming November rejection of the Bush-Cheney-McCain crowd.
Barack Obama who is for the moment underperforming with white women will undoubtedly improve his standing as the campaign crystallizes how dangerous an instrument the Supreme Court has become to the cause of liberty, specifically women's liberty.
Lose any one of the five-member majority, and replace him/her with a Scalia/Roberts/Alito/Thomas clone, as John McCain has promised to do were he elected, and the right of a woman to choose will vanish. MAKE NO MISTAKE.
The decades-old victory by the feminist movement (to which Hillary Clinton and many of her supporters can proudly lay claim) for women to have the simple power over their own bodies means nothing to the hateful ideology that is prepared to eradicate the centuries-old habeas corpus rights.
Thus, look for Hillary's supporters to move decisively to Obama's camp as the repercussions of a John McCain win become clear and unity beats back the forces of hate and tyranny. Obama should be thinking about Hillary as a Supreme Court appointment for when he wins this fall.
Comments
standingup
June 13, 2008 - 16:37
Permalink
I regret to be the one
to inform you of this news but many Clinton supporters are not warming up to the idea one uterus equals one vote. I have heard numerous accounts of them being tired of what they feel is an attempt to blackmail them with into voting for Obama by envoking the Roe v. Wade argument.
Also, keep in mind the President appoints a nominee to the Supreme Court but the nominee does not become a Justice without the consent and approval of the U.S. Senate. I think many women support and vote for Democratic Senators fully expecting them to act in accordance with their constitutional power of advice and consent.
Let me refer you to a post from someone, who did not vote for Obama in the primary but will be in the fall, who expresses the sentiments of so many much better than I do here. She wrote "In case you were wondering" in response to this delightful discussion between Chuck Todd and Chris Matthews:
Roxy
June 13, 2008 - 23:11
Permalink
Yup ... that post about covers it ...
especially like this part ...
Count me in amongst those "angy, older women". And I will lodge a protest vote in November. Obama isn't getting a pass from me.
-----
ePMedia ... get the scoop with us!
If it's true that our species is alone in the universe, then I'd have to say that the universe aimed rather low and settled for very little. ~ George Carlin
cho
June 14, 2008 - 12:48
Permalink
Wow... Kate Harding nails it.
I was always an Edwards supporter, but Harding pretty much nails about how I feel toward those hate-filled boot-stompers in the blogosphere who made adult-like dialog impossible.
susie dow
June 14, 2008 - 13:21
Permalink
I'm teetering
On abstaining.
I wish it weren't so.