Obama and Nooses

As John McCain asks his supporters to be more respectful of Barack Obama - and gets booed for it by his rabid supporters - MSOC at My Left Wing finds some disturbing actions by the right wing:

Courtesy of the Racists at Political Byline

While noting some of the advertisers that support the right wing site that created and posted that disturbing picture...

HOLY SHIT. McCain-Palin 2008 ADVERTISES on a site that's implying that lynching Obama is their "SOLUTION."

This is vile and disgusting stuff and is the lowest of the low that this country has to offer.

I have written on this topic a few times.
Some empty bottles of New Milford Brew:

Bill O'Reilly on Lynching Michelle Obama

Via Crooks and Liars, where they have the video up:

Keith Olbermann brings on Washington Post’s Eugene Robinson to discuss the horrific history behind Bill O’Reilly’s casual and callous use of the phrase “lynching party” in reference to Michelle Obama’s quote about being really proud of this country and the implications one may draw from it.

You know what lynching was? Lynching was a horrific practice of murder, torture, dismemberment, burning alive, hanging, and the only purpose of lynching was to perpetuate white supremacy in the Jim Crow south. It wasn’t…the idea of course, wasn’t to lynch all black people, but by lynching a few black people…not a few, by lynching some black people to demonstrate to other African Americans that this could happen to you, that you have no power, that we have all the power, and that we can take anything we want from you, including your life. There’s nothing funny about lynching. There’s certainly nothing at all funny or remotely appropriate about the use of a lynching reference to talk about Michelle Obama. And the word “unless” followed by “we’ll track it down,” is way beyond the pale.

I agree with Eugene Robinson on this topic, but I also think that it goes beyond just the racial issues:

Is Racism on the Rise in the USA?

I am sadly leaning towards a "yes" considering the reports of things that are going on locally in Connecticut and, via Man Eegee, around the rest of the country:

I'm sure race has nothing to with the recent surge of nooses in the news since we are soooo over bigotry in the U.S.

Police are looking for whoever dangled a 3-foot rope with a small loop at its end from a tree outside a campus cultural center that is home to several black organizations. The incident is being treated as a possible hate crime.

"This is bigger than a noose," Black Student Union President Altmann Pannell told his fellow students, many of whom were wearing "Terps as one" buttons."

"This is bigger than a noose because we as a community know that something else is going on in this country," Pannell said to murmurs of agreement.

That "something else" is not missed by minority communties, especially when the disparities in justice are blatantly tied to the color of one's skin.

For a year, Jena (pronounced JEEN-uh), a poor mining community of 3,000 people, has been embroiled in racial tensions pitting the black community against white school officials and a white prosecutor. It began last August when a black student asked at an assembly if black students could sit under a tree where white students usually sat. The next day, two nooses hung from the tree.

Black parents were outraged by the symbolism, recalling the mob lynchings of black men. They complained to school officials. District superintendent Roy Breithaupt and the school board gave three-day suspensions to the white students who hung the nooses, overruling the recommendation of then-principal Scott Windham that the students be expelled.


The case of the Jena Six has been covered extensively by fellow bloggers, such as Hello, Negro with information on how to donate to the defense fund; also My Right Mind! who offers a slew of tips to assist these young teens.

Nooses are more than just complex slip knots in a rope - they are both symbolic and directly representative of torture, murder and racist mob rule.

Man Eegee has some more bad news on this sad reality check...

But before you go there, I want you to think about this:

Lynching is sometimes justified by its supporters as the administration of justice (in a social-moral sense, not in law) without the delays and inefficiencies inherent to the legal system; in this way it echoes the Reign of Terror during the French Revolution, which was justified by the claim:

"Terror is nothing other than
prompt, severe, inflexible justice."

What are some of the possible reasons why racism seems to be on the rise in the Good Ol' USA? Hey! It's not like anyone in our government would ever encourage this kind of terrorizing behavior with its own actions and ideologies...

The "traditional" conservative Claes G. Ryn has argued that neoconservatives are "a variety of neo-Jacobins." Ryn maintains that true conservatives deny the existence of a universal political and economic philosophy and model that is suitable for all societies and cultures, and believe that a society's institutions should be adjusted to suit its culture, while Neo-Jacobins

are attached in the end to ahistorical, supranational principles that they believe should supplant the traditions of particular societies. The new Jacobins see themselves as on the side of right and fighting evil and are not prone to respecting or looking for common ground with countries that do not share their democratic preferences. (Ryn 2003: 387)

Further examining the relationship between Neoconservatism and moral rhetoric, Ryn argues that

Neo-Jacobinism regards America as founded on universal principles and assigns to the United States the role of supervising the remaking of the world. Its adherents have the intense dogmatic commitment of true believers and are highly prone to moralistic rhetoric. They demand, among other things, "moral clarity" in dealing with regimes that stand in the way of America's universal purpose. They see themselves as champions of "virtue." (p. 384).

Thus, according to Ryn, neoconservatism is analogous to Bolshevism: in the same way that the Bolsheviks wanted to destroy established ways of life throughout the world to replace them with communism, the neoconservatives want to do the same, only imposing free-market capitalism and American-style liberal democracy instead of socialism.

Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, former chief of staff to U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell, had the following to say in a December, 2005 interview with the German weekly Der Spiegel:

"They are not new conservatives. They're Jacobins. Their predecessor is French Revolution leader Maximilien Robespierre."

Sheeple see... Sheeple do...
Or some terrorizing thought like that?

His statement makes Bill O'Reilly both racist and a homegrown terrorist, IMHO. The Jacobins used lynching to terrorize the people during the French revolution, and the neoconservatives/Jacobins do it today.

The prospect of even a symbolic press lynching party is a horrible and disgusting message for O'Reilly to send to Michelle Obama and it is meant to go to the entire African American community in the USA... But it is also part of the "Fear Campaign" meant for the consumption and terrorizing of all Americans and to spill over to the rest of the world.

[Added note] This is the second time that particular right wing Blog has used that exact same image. Once during the primaries and again now, though, they have since removed the image. There is no excuse for that kind of behavior. Political Bylines is clearly a hate site. MLN has this up too.

[update] Edited to reflect the fact that Political Bylines is not a McCain supporter and in fact is a right wing Libertarian Bob Barr supporter. Thanks to Standingup for fact checking this and correcting my error. My apologies to John McCain for originally attributing this sick image to his supporters.

No votes yet


This is the second time that Blog has put that same picture up. Once during the primaries and again now. They have taken it down but it was there.

and undeniable fact that racism is still very alive in our nation. I think we can expect the first candidacy of a black man for president with a real chance of winning to bring the worst of the racists out of the woodwork.

side note on making a connection with the site in question as a McCain supporter. ePluribus Media would be considered a McCain supporting site if guided by the same standards of having a McCain ad on the site. The act of accepting an ad buy or purchasing an ad on a website doesn't constitute support of either party in either direction.

Actually, if you look at the rest of the site you will see the site owner is supporting Bob Barr. And a quick read thru some of his previous posts verifies he is no fan of the current administration or the GOP ticket.

Just my two cents on accuracy of allegations. Racism is unacceptable but it is not practiced solely by Republicans. There are racist Democrats, Libertarians, and Independents.

I'll have to edit this later (as soon as I have time). The Blog does appear to be a Barr supporter.

that I ran across after my earlier comment. One of the sites that does financial analysis has the following up in the area where ads are usually placed:

Served Ads Suspension
Until After the Election

IRA is suspending the insertion of some of our advertising sources until after the election. Unfortunately, we have detected that the purchase of keywords on the internet has started to saturate what used to be topical advertising channels with political messaging. We understand the reasoning behind these reach strategies. However, these ads have begun to interfere with the perception of who we are as a business. Our customers come first and we regret this action but we feel it was inappropriate for electoral interests to impose themselves into the ad categories we selected to be of collateral value to our users. We will evaluate the ad content again after election day.

I have to say it is the first time I have seen a site take that approach. I guess it shows that a lot of people do make certain associations with the ads.

people are probably right to make the association for the simple reason that if they don't support a cause OR if they want to remain neutral they can filter ads from most sources or they can just take down the source temporarily as the site you mention did. Advertisers can usually block where their ads can and can't go to, as well.

IMHO people are right to get pissed when they see ads from groups that we are fighting taking up a premium spot on places like dKos.

But if I don't own the site... It isn't my place to make those business decisions.

What I got was an error message. Interesting!