The ACORN I Know By David Swanson

[Reposted from author's site with permission]

By David Swanson

If someone told you that a bunch of low-income people, most of them African-American or Latino, most of them women, most of them elderly, had been victimized by a predatory mortgage lender that stripped them of much of their equity or of their entire homes, you might not be surprised. But if I told you that these women and men had gotten together and, after three years of work, brought the nation's largest high-cost lender to its knees, forced it to sell out to a foreign company, and won back a half a billion dollars of what had been taken from them-one of the largest consumer settlements ever-you'd probably ask me what country this had happened in. Surely it couldn't have been in the United States of the Second Gilded Age, the land of unbridled corporate power and radical government activism on behalf of the rich and the greedy.

Yet, it was. These victims identified a problem and named it "predatory lending" in the late 1990s. Their campaign to reform Household International (also known as Household Finance and as Beneficial) played out from 2001 to 2003, concluding with a settlement that includes a ban on badmouthing the company. That's why more people haven't heard about this. The families who fought back and defeated Household are barred from bragging about it or teaching the lessons they learned, because that would require recounting the damage that Household did to homes and neighborhoods. These families are members of ACORN, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now.

I was ACORN's communications coordinator during much of the Household campaign, but left before it ended. No one has asked me not to tell this story.

In low-income minority neighborhoods in the United States, what
little wealth there is, is in home equity. Home equity makes up 74.9
percent of the net wealth for Hispanics in the bottom two income
quintiles (0-40 percent) and 78.7 percent of the net wealth for African
Americans in the second income quintile (20-40 percent). There have
been gains in minority home ownership over the past few decades, in
part as a result of the work by community groups like ACORN and
National People's Action to force banks to make loans in these
communities, but the home ownership is fragile and not protected by
additional savings. Lenders in the past decade have focused on
stripping away equity and community groups have been forced to focus on
keeping out loans that are worse than no loans at all.

Most high-cost loans are refinance loans. Too often they are
marketed aggressively and deceptively, including through live- checks
in the mail that result in very high-cost loans that the lender will be
only too happy to refinance into a new mortgage. Often these loans are
made with excessive, sometimes variable, interest rates, outrageously
high fees, and fees financed into the loans so that the borrower pays
interest on them and often is not told about them. They are made with
bogus products built in, on which the borrower also pays interest.
Hidden balloon payments force repeated refinancings for additional fees
each time. Mandatory arbitration clauses attempt to prevent borrowers
from taking lenders to court. The practice of loaning more than the
value of a home traps borrowers in loans they cannot refinance with a
responsible lender. Consolidation of additional debts further decreases
equity, placing the home at greater risk. Quiet omission of taxes and
insurance from a mortgage that previously included those charges
results in a crisis when yearly bills arrive.

Predatory lenders turn the usual logic of lending upside down. They
make their money by intentionally making loans that the borrowers will
be unable to repay. They charge fees for each refinancing until finally
seizing the house. Fannie Mae has estimated that as many as half of all
borrowers in subprime (high-cost) loans could have qualified for a
lower cost mortgage.

High-cost loans are not just made to people with poor credit.
They're often made to people who have poor banking services in their
neighborhoods.

ACORN members don't take abuse of their neighborhoods lying down,
and Household was a leading cause of the rows of vacant houses
appearing in ACORN neighborhoods in the 1990s. ACORN launched a
campaign to reform Household that included numerous strategies. One, an
ACORN stand-by, was direct action. Repeatedly, ACORN members in
numerous cities around the country simultaneously protested in
Household offices to demand reform. At the same time, ACORN was working
to pass anti-predatory lending legislation in local and state
governments and Congress. ACORN members made sure that in each case the
victims testifying were victims of Household and that Household's
abuses were highlighted. When ACORN released major reports on predatory
lending, the examples included were always from Household.

ACORN also worked with the Coalition for Responsible Wealth to
advance a shareholder resolution that would have tied Household's
executives' compensation to ending its predatory lending. In 2001
Household held its shareholders meeting in an out-of-the-way suburb of
Tampa, Florida. A crowd of ACORN members was there with shark suits and
shark balloons to protest.

The resolution won 5 percent. Over the next year, ACORN pressured
state pension funds and other shareholders. Household held its 2002
meeting an hour and a half from the nearest airport in rural Kentucky.
Members made the trip by car from all over the country. The protest may
have been the biggest thing the town of London, Kentucky had seen in
years. The resolution won 30 percent.

As a result, various local and state governments threatened to
divest from Household. ACORN also put pressure on stores like Best Buy
that used Household credit cards. At the same time, ACORN Housing
Corporation was assisting many Household victims in either refinancing
out of their Household loans or at least canceling some of the rip-off
services built into their loans, such as credit insurance. ACORN was
also getting the word out to stay away from Household.

ACORN wrote up numerous accounts of Household predatory loans and
took them to the attorney generals in state after state urging
investigations. ACORN similarly pressured federal regulators to act.
ACORN assisted borrowers in filing a number of class-action suits
against Household targeting those of its practices that were clearly
illegal even under existing law. They let Wall Street analysts know
what Household stood to lose from these lawsuits, as well as from
various reforms that Household periodically announced in its attempt to
hold off the pressure.

But ACORN members never let up. They protested again and again at
Household offices and held press conferences in front of homes about to
be lost to Household. They protested the secondary market that was
putting up capital for these predatory loans and they held a major
protest at the trade group that lobbied in Washington for Household and
its fellow sharks. Then, in the summer of 2002, in the wealthy suburbs
north of Chicago, victims of Household from around the country poured
out of busses by the thousands onto the lawns of the board members and
the CEO of Household. They knocked on doors and spoke to those who had
hurt them from a distance. When the police made them leave, ACORN
members plastered "Wanted" posters all over the neighborhood telling
the board members' neighbors what crimes the Household executives were
guilty of.

Through all of this, we worked the media. I kept a database of
victims' stories and contact information and put them in touch with
reporters whenever the reporters were willing to tell not just the
victimization story but also the story of fighting back. We generated
several hundred print articles and several hundred TV and radio stories
about Household's predatory lending practices. We worked the small
neighborhood papers, flyers in churches, posters on walls. We provoked
lengthy articles in the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street
Journal, Los Angeles Times , and Forbes Magazine . We kept up an
endless barrage in the trade press: the American Banker, National
Mortgage News, etc.

A handful of ACORN staff people with great expertise and unrelenting
effort organized thousands of members to drive this campaign until
Household agreed to pay victims $489 million through the 50 states
attorneys general, and later agreed to pay millions more through ACORN,
as well as to reform its practices.

This campaign was an example of what can be done if enough different
angles are pursued at once and the company ripping you off is put on
the defensive and constantly hit with the unexpected. This campaign
increased the size and power of ACORN to effect future progressive
change. This is good news for low-income neighborhoods, but bad news
for Wells Fargo, the predatory lender next on ACORN's list.

David Swanson was communications coordinator for ACORN from 2000 to
2003, and is the author of the new book "Daybreak: Undoing the Imperial
Presidency and Forming a More Perfect Union" by Seven Stories Press.
You can order it and find out when tour will be in your town: http://davidswanson.org/book


The ACORN I Know by David Swanson.

0
No votes yet

Comments

of his experiences, the good and the bad of it, at the Booman Tribune:

"My Experience With ACORN"

I'll be reading it. Hope that there are lots more out there like these.

-----
"I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations which dare already to challenge our government in a trial of strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country." - Thomas Jefferson

To condemn the entire organization because a few of them may have made a mistake or been truly bad is as wrong as condemning all politicians... Wait... Bad example. lol