It's DeFault of The Rich

The kings and queens of the real world monopoly (and 10 digit welfare checks) are walking away from their million dollar homes now. Via Balloon Juice:

I can’t wait to hear how Republicans try to pin this shit on black people and Fannie Mae and Barney Frank.

A little bit from the article - "Biggest Defaulters on Mortgages Are the Rich" - below the fold.

More than one in seven homeowners with loans in excess of a million dollars are seriously delinquent, according to data compiled for The New York Times by the real estate analytics firm CoreLogic.

By contrast, homeowners with less lavish housing are much more likely to keep writing checks to their lender. About one in 12 mortgages below the million-dollar mark is delinquent.

Though it is hard to prove, the CoreLogic data suggest that many of the well-to-do are purposely dumping their financially draining properties, just as they would any sour investment.

“The rich are different: they are more ruthless,” said Sam Khater, CoreLogic’s senior economist.

Keep that last statement (emph. mine) in mind as they try to destroy social safety nets like Medicaid, Social Security, Medicare and unemployment for the middle class and the poor so they can keep their elitist corporate welfare gravy train in bailouts and tax cuts rolling over you.

The rich are ruthless and this is class war.

They walked away from their massive banking debts and unloaded them on you. They sc-r-ree-eeched about the poor and middle class walking away from the homes. And now they, themselves, are walking away from their even bigger mortgage disasters that they, themselves, built.

And now they want to turn their disaster capitalism on your social safety nets?

Which side are you on? And just what are you going to do about it?

[update] Naomi Klein:

Sticking the public with the bill for the bankers’ crisis

My city feels like a crime scene and the criminals are all melting into the night, fleeing the scene. No, I’m not talking about the kids in black who smashed windows and burned cop cars on Saturday.

I’m talking about the heads of state who, on Sunday night, smashed social safety nets and burned good jobs in the middle of a recession. Faced with the effects of a crisis created by the world’s wealthiest and most privileged strata, they decided to stick the poorest and most vulnerable people in their countries with the bill.

How else can we interpret the G20’s final communiqué, which includes not even a measly tax on banks or financial transactions, yet instructs governments to slash their deficits in half by 2013. This is a huge and shocking cut, and we should be very clear who will pay the price: students who will see their public educations further deteriorate as their fees go up; pensioners who will lose hard-earned benefits; public-sector workers whose jobs will be eliminated. And the list goes on. These types of cuts have already begun in many G20 countries including Canada, and they are about to get a lot worse.

They are happening for a simple reason. When the G20 met in London in 2009, at the height of the financial crisis, the leaders failed to band together to regulate the financial sector so that this type of crisis would never happen again. All we got was empty rhetoric, and an agreement to put trillions of dollars in public monies on the table to shore up the banks around the world. Meanwhile the U.S. government did little to keep people in their homes and jobs, so in addition to hemorrhaging public money to save the banks, the tax base collapsed, creating an entirely predictable debt and deficit crisis.

Read on...

0
No votes yet

Comments


over the James Taylor version:

Taylor, back in the day:

I've got a screencap-copy of that class warfare claim.

Just how frigging overdue is this?

The rich are ruthless and this is class war.

They walked away from their massive banking debts and unloaded them on you. They sc-r-ree-eeched about the poor and middle class walking away from the homes. And now they, themselves, are walking away from their even bigger mortgage disasters that they, themselves, built.

And now they want to turn their disaster capitalism on your social safety nets?

Which side are you on? And just what are you going to do about it?

Glad to know that people are not conditioned free of the flight or FIGHT response anymore, at least they remember there used to be an alternative.

-----
"I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations which dare already to challenge our government in a trial of strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country." - Thomas Jefferson


But I am really pissed about some of the stuff I am reading about these days. If many are to be believed... Nancy Pelosi has already tossed social safety nets under the bus. Never mind all of the other issues that have already been run over.

that I am remembering my name correctly from yesterday and so, yes, dammit, I did wake up in the same screwed decade and we still are suffering from the aftereffects of a Republican revolutionary era quantity of economic and regulatory rape.

But it usually takes me getting into the third or fourth cup to grok that yeah, it's the Democrats who've reconditioned themselves to be in line with the corporate-agenda of the profit-driven, shareholder-valuing advertiser-friendly thing upon which we once relied to be informed as an electorate.  

WTF!  Every person in this country knows who stole the money and why every municipality is at the edge.  We know who took the money and whose record farking wages are now 1700-fold greater than the average worker (if she's working).  

Time for the magnitude of change that produces speciation events but in time for the next election, with a preceding "R.".   

I guess I'm a really poor judge of what constitutes "too much pain" to the average Jane/Joe.  Clearly we're not there yet.