It's the "New Haiti"

Michel Collins

The appointment of former presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush
as key players in Haitian relief should cause the people of Haiti grave
concern, if they weren't otherwise preoccupied with survival. These
former presidents' records as pro-life advocates on the international
scene is tarnished by real world outcomes.

During his eight years as president, Clinton was responsible for sanctions on Iraq that resulted in the deaths of 170,000 children under five.
Former President George W. Bush exceeded that death toll by invading
Iraq.   That  caused civil chaos and conflict among Iraqis leading to
the deaths of over one million citizens in that tragic nation. When you see these two coming, their record speaks for itself. 


What will happen in Haiti? What can the citizens of that nation
expect? It's instructive to look at the post Katrina rescue effort with
a focus on New Orleans as a prototype.

"The  Cleansing of New Orleans"

In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, more than 200,000 citizens of
New Orleans were transported  to cities around the United States. 
Houston and Atlanta were major centers for congregating survivors. 
Shortly after the involuntary exodus, 43% wanted to return to New Orleans, and 44% wanted to stay in their new homes, and 12% were unsure of their choice.

Little did Katrina's survivors know that they would never have a
choice.  The state of Louisiana sent a message right away.  Procedures
were established to make sure that none of the refugees would be able
to vote by absentee ballot unless they first returned home
and voted in person.  Of course, most lacked the resources to do that. 
Through a variety techniques and excuses, the survivors were turned into permanent non residents of their former home, without regard to their preference.  The politics of relocation has whited out the city's former political make up.

The combined class and ethnic cleansing has continued in New Orleans.  The evidence is the eviction of poor people from structures not harmed by the hurricane, and the re-zoning of areas where survivors could return into enclaves for the wealthy.  It's called progress.

Haiti's Opportunities for Progress

Haiti is not New Orleans but give the financial elite some time.
They're just warming up. This is, after all, their first captive nation
due to natural calamity.  They didn't have to fire a shot. The people
are starving, unarmed, traumatized, and incapable of resistance. All
this can be theirs!

There are some similarities to the post Katrina operation. Like New
Orleanians, Haitians went without food and water for days. When
supplies arrived, the effort was handled by military organizers.

The corporate media portrayed the starving citizens of New Orleans as looters as they foraged for anything to keep them alive. Haiti was no different. There was looting,
we were told, without the post-script that people were literally
starving and thirsting to death. Apparently, the security forces failed
to debrief first-hand observers on the ground who reported no such lawlessness.  Domestic and foreign oligarchs are the real looters of Haiti.  They started well before the earthquake.

While the military secured the scene for relief, food, water, and medical care waited in line.The
several days of delay created a fatigue and physical debilitation among
citizens. It worked to make whatever security might have been needed
much easier. A weakened population can be  contained efficiently, with
minimal force.

The most important similarities between New Orleans and Haiti are
ethnicity and class based. In New Orleans, the majority of damage
occurred in black, largely poor districts of the city. In Haiti, the
entire nation is both black and, for the most part, living in poverty.

But the Haiti's divergence from the New Orleans story line is
significant. It represents an entire nation, a huge, strategically
placed land mass just waiting for the type of rehabilitation that New
Orleans only dreamed about. And to the rescuers must have big plans.


It's the “New Haiti”

Bill Clinton stood  breathless on the tarmac of the crowded
Port-au-Prince airport extolling the cooperation of all the Latin
American nations. He said something like, they all want to be part of the new Haiti.
That's probably the best storm warning that Haitians will get regarding
their fate.  Their nation and culture are in the cross hairs of the
theme park entrepreneurs always seeking another real estate fiasco to
perpetrate. Dubai World is dead. It's on to Haiti!

One wonders if the forces of repression have waited all these years to finally get even for losing and entire nation in  “the only successful slave revolt in history,” an inspiration to people everywhere.

But isn't this is a bleak vision given the outpouring of offers from
all over the world?  Individuals have contributed generously to Haitian
relief. They are to be commended for their efforts, which are
considerable. But individual contributions of several million can't
match the hundreds of millions in commitments (not deliverables) of aid
through national and multinational entities.  These are the people
calling the shots.

What can Haitians anticipate from the first world geniuses? Military
occupation is first up. The security forces were first in because they
were the force selected to
run the show.  The absence of a Haitian government is the problem,
we're told. But that absence originated when the United States kidnapped the elected president
of Haiti and spirited him off to Africa, for “his safety.” The current
government is virtually non existent, other than the U.S. favored
president who officially welcomed foreign assistance.

The military emphasis will give way to food and water plus medical care.
But will this relief be supplied in time to help the people? After days
of dehydration and starvation, is the population ripe for disease? Will there be sufficient resources to deal with this? Are we going to hear about the need for temporary relocation as we did in New Orleans?

Will the current US model of funding banks and forgetting the people be employed, a variation of the trickle down approach?

What will the nation building look like? Iraq? Afghanistan?

Will the people of Haiti ever get a chance to rule their own nation?


Special thanks to Kathlyn Stone for her helpful comments.

This article may be reproduced in whole or in part with attribution of authorship and a link to this article.

No votes yet


(he is from Montreal too) put up a message on facebook saying that what is going on in Haiti is what the USA can expect to see if we ever have a disaster and part of it was our lack of healthcare. (Paraphrasing)

Had to comment on it (something along the lines of this): In case anyone missed the Bush years, Haiti is starting to look like the next Katrina.

And it is. The big difference here? You knew there would be a bit more of a delay to get American help into Haiti because of the distance. And as Klein has been saying from the get-go... We have to keep an eye on the Disaster Capitalism.

Too late. They are being occupied. And sadly, the place was already a stripped-down-government, privatized neocon wet-dream BEFORE the earthquake.

against the inclusion of Bush as part of the Bush-Clinton 'team' and I found myself thinking only in terms of the ability to bring money to bear upon the need for rapid aid to a ravaged population. 

I found myself arguing, perhaps naievely, that if Bush can get his cadre of kleptos to actually help with money, why not recyle some of what they stole from the rest of us into one of the poorest areas of the Western hemisphere.

My agument did assume he'd not be gaining anything more than the possible chance to remake his post-WH image with good deed.  And I hoped he'd exhaust himself in doing so.

I'm unsure of how much of the slow response can be attributed to matters beyond the destruction of an already impoverished ifrastructure, but I'm willing to listen in the quite possible event that I'm wrong.

"I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations which dare already to challenge our government in a trial of strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country." - Thomas Jefferson

We'll see. I'm satisfied that Katrina is the best guide tactically and that the values of the Bush and successor regimes represent the strategy that we can anticipate.

We've seen the military take over and toss out "security" as the first concern. The nations are squabeling and now the NGO's.

I hope the people get relief and an abundance of ongoing help.

"Furthest from him is best, whom reason hath equaled, force hath made supreme above his equals." Milton

If our foreign brothers are going to insult us, they need to get it right. Katrina is an exemplar ... and Haiti is getting there.

What's striking about Katrena is the amnesia by the power structure. All those people moved out, without a chance to return. That's harsh.

"Furthest from him is best, whom reason hath equaled, force hath made supreme above his equals." Milton